High-interest payday loans have actually proliferated in modern times; therefore too have efforts to manage them. Yet exactly exactly just how borrowers react to such laws continues to be largely unknown. Drawing on both administrative and survey information, we exploit variation in payday-lending regulations to review the consequence of cash advance limitations on customer borrowing. We realize that although such policies work well at reducing lending that is payday customers react by moving to many other kinds of high-interest credit (as an example, pawnshop loans) as opposed to conventional credit instruments (for example, charge cards). Such shifting exists, but less pronounced, when it comes to payday that is lowest-income users. Our results declare that policies that target payday financing in isolation may be inadequate at reducing customers’ reliance on high-interest credit.